Charlson comorbidity index adjustment in intracerebral hemorrhage.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous studies of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) outcome prediction models have not systematically included adjustment for comorbid conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with early mortality and long-term functional outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis on a prospective observational cohort of patients with ICH admitted to 2 University of California San Francisco hospitals from June 1, 2001 to May 31, 2004. Components of the ICH score and use of early care limitations were recorded. Outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale to 12 months. The CCI was derived using hospital discharge International Classification of Diseases, revision 9 codes and patient history obtained from standardized case report forms. RESULTS In this cohort of 243 ICH patients, comorbid conditions were common, with CCI scores ranging from 0 to 12. Only 29% of patients with high CCI scores (≥3) achieved a 12-month modified Rankin Scale score of ≥3 compared with 48% of patients with CCI scores of 0 (P=0.02). CCI score was independently predictive of 12-month functional outcome, with higher CCI having a greater impact (CCI=2: odds ratio, 2.3; P=0.06; CCI=≥3: odds ratio, 3.5; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Comorbid medical conditions as measured by the CCI independently influence outcome after ICH. Future ICH outcome studies should account for the impact of comorbidities on patient outcome.
منابع مشابه
A comparison of the recording of comorbidity in primary and secondary care by using the Charlson Index to predict short-term and long-term survival in a routine linked data cohort
OBJECTIVE Hospital admission records provide snapshots of clinical histories for a subset of the population admitted to hospital. In contrast, primary care records provide continuous clinical histories for complete populations, but might lack detail about inpatient stays. Therefore, combining primary and secondary care records should improve the ability of comorbidity scores to predict survival...
متن کاملAssessing measures of comorbidity and functional status for risk adjustment to compare hospital performance for colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective data-linkage study
BACKGROUND Comparing outcomes between hospitals requires consideration of patient factors that could account for any observed differences. Adjusting for comorbid conditions is common when studying outcomes following cancer surgery, and a commonly used measure is the Charlson comorbidity index. Other measures of patient health include the ECOG performance status and the ASA physical status score...
متن کاملObservational intensity bias associated with illness adjustment: cross sectional analysis of insurance claims
OBJECTIVE To determine the bias associated with frequency of visits by physicians in adjusting for illness, using diagnoses recorded in administrative databases. SETTING Claims data from the US Medicare program for services provided in 2007 among 306 US hospital referral regions. DESIGN Cross sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS 20% sample of fee for service Medicare beneficiaries residing in...
متن کاملThe performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims.
BACKGROUND The Charlson Score is a particularly popular form of comorbidity adjustment in claims data analysis. However, the effects of certain implementation decisions have not been empirically examined. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of alternative data sources and lookback periods on the performance of Charlson scores in the prediction of mortality following hospitalization. SUBJECTS...
متن کاملComparison of Elixhauser and Charlson Methods for Predicting Oral Cancer Survival
Cancer survival correlates not only with the features of primary malignancy but also with the degree of underlying comorbidities. Of the multiple methods used for evaluating the impact of comorbidities on survival, the Charlson and Elixhauser methods are most common. This study compared these 2 comorbidity measures for predicting survival in oral cancer patients. Using the Taiwan National Healt...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Stroke
دوره 42 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011